Ex dom

[Deleted Member]

I think if anything identifiable is redacted. So long as she agrees to it. If she don’t. Then don’t.

[ma****]

Thank you for all your comments

[Scottishdombull]

4 minutes ago, donnington391 said:

Thank you for all your comments

You are very welcome

[Deleted Member]

The ‘ex’ part of this question is redundant. A previous OR current partner doesn’t have the right to use any material without the consent of all parties it implicates or identifies.

[Ij****]

The only way I think this might be acceptable is if the photos were for something like a shibari tutorial and you were aware at the time that that was the intent. And then I would say they should be taken down if the sub requests it.

[Be****]

No not at all

[uk****]

21 minutes ago, donnington391 said:

Thank you for all your comments

Anytime 👍🏻

[StrictMaster44]

Absolutely not!!

[Deleted Member]

Personally. If a girl (submissive or not) sends me images - then they’re mine and only mine. Sharing them online or in person without her consent is a straight up d**khead move!

[Ro****]

No

[Jo****]

What in the backwards blackmail bs is this nonsense? Absolutely no photos/no videos, no art that a submissive creates which that’s what it is, art, should ever be used. Not in, a for instance, kind of manner. No matter the circumstances, the relationship ended, thusly so should the value of the art. Keep the memories, delete the art, it’s the honorable way to handle things.

[Justchillme]

Considering everything is based on consent . That rule applies still . It should never be a question. Without trust we have nothing . That's really the basis of the relationship. And it extends if the dom / sub part of it is over . Otherwise it's stalker behavior. People need to move on when it's time to.

[Do****]

Short answer, no. More complex, would be it depends on what agreements were made about the pictures, maybe. That said any man Dom or not with a shred of honor wouldn't.

[mo****]

In my opinion, I don’t think that is respectful. But then again it depends on what you’re using them for.

[ma****]

Sounds like this is one of those things that goes along with this entire lifestyle: consent. If said sub consents to that, then sure knock yourself out; if said sub does not consent, OR consent cannot be given on the matter, it's a hard no. Even if y'all were into cnc or anything in that field, hard no. That "ex" status changed the rules of engagement (though in truth that's something that should be conversed about with any current sub).

It is worth inquiring as to the nature of the use of pics, but my statement still stands, that inquiry bears no relevance over the main point.

[Deleted Member]

I’m new here, but morally this isn’t right, let alone illegal in most places. Completely disgraceful, and I know I wouldn’t do it nor allow it if I were in either position.

[ma****]

1 hour ago, kalamazoo204 said:

I think if anything identifiable is redacted. So long as she agrees to it. If she don’t. Then don’t.

I agree wholeheartedly. The whole thing hinges on the "if" factor, consent from the sub on the matter is the entire point. No consent, no pic use, done and done. And I feel like that applies possibly with more emphasis in cnc and similar dynamic, like yes the whole principle is NC, but it's very existence relies on consent in the first place. That's why we got safe words yo 😊

[ma****]

2 hours ago, RektorSirT said:

Looks like it’s the UK. In which case no provided it’s any kind of private picture. If it’s a public street scene and you’re not the main subject of the photo it would be ok. Same if you are the main subject in any kind of public setting and indicate by your behaviour (eg posing willingly) it might also be ok, though it gets complicated here. However in any kind of private setting it would be a clear no independently of appearance in the photo. While there’s no right to privacy in public, there is in private.

Yooo somebody did research to emphasize the consent point, well done!

[ex****]

use them for what? personal use, or are you asking if you should post them online?

[Deleted Member]

Without knowing n consented No

[de****]

3 hours ago, typhoon2 said:

No. Morally it's widely recognised to be wrong. Legally it's definitely wrong and there are a number of laws that would apply, leading to potential jail sentences for the former Dominant.

Barely anyone left now with morals though 😕🖤

[Rose-5256]

I would say no. But that’s just me

[ma****]

No-one, regardless their title or role, should use someone's pictures without that someone's prior consent. I think sharing someone's pictures (in particular the intimate ones) without permission is illegal.

[Deleted Member]

Would you like it done to you if you were in their shoes ? I think not. The pics are of an actual human being with rights and feelings you can’t just take them and do what you please, Dom or not.

[Da****]

8 hours ago, cuckcoupleGuelph519 said:

I do

You do... You're an a**.. The answer is always no...