Jump to content

BAD SEX OR NO SEX AT ALL?


br****

Recommended Posts

Posted
Agreed no sex better than bad. Unless you’ve got an eager willing to learn partner with potential and I think can carry it through any perfect world. Have a trained personalized sex partner.
Posted
Bad sex has room to get better. No sex means id have to crave the actual thing forever.
Posted
No sex at all unless it can get better; toys are better than bad sex that never improves.
Posted
no sex at all how can i get one?
Posted
Bad sex - because there is a possibility to make it great sex. You and your partner just need to try different things to make it great for both of you. Or you're just with the wrong partner.
Posted
bad sex because there are plenty of toys to finish
Posted
Rather have bad sex because you can always turn it into good sex
Posted
Well the option of sex or no sex really comes down to the individual. And whether or not they're biological desires can't handle not having sex versus having some form of the release that comes from having sex regardless bad or good
Posted
No sex because if the sex is bad I'm not finishing or having fun.
Posted
1 hour ago, RabidBabyRed said:
No sex because if the sex is bad I'm not finishing or having fun.

Well true for women having bad sex is not always the best. But for men not having sex at all is bad for defrostating

Posted
Just now, PapaPan said:

Well true for women having bad sex is not always the best. But for men not having sex at all is bad for defrostating

Got to love auto collect, prostate was the word

Posted
1 hour ago, RabidBabyRed said:
No sex because if the sex is bad I'm not finishing or having fun.

I think it's different between men and women, since women require extensive attention in order to give them full satisfaction, which the releases a man experiences is satisfaction.

Posted
59 minutes ago, PapaPan said:

I think it's different between men and women, since women require extensive attention in order to give them full satisfaction, which the releases a man experiences is satisfaction.

Very true, our experiences do differ in what requirements our body has when it comes to orgasming.

Posted
I havent had a lot of bad sex. So long as its enjoyable for both parties. For me, i would rather 🥵 than 🥶
Posted
8 hours ago, RabidBabyRed said:

Very true, our experiences do differ in what requirements our body has when it comes to orgasming.

Something most of the time is not thought about. A thoughtful person will take care of you before they take care of themselves regardless of the level of good sex / bad sex. But then as i think of it taking care of a partner insures at least someone is satisfied, and that in itself is satisfying

Posted

Take the bad sex cause that can always get better with a little exploration and communication. I've had plenty of bad sex, only cause I've had a lot of sex. Used to be If it's bad move on quick cause there is more around the corner. Now I like to think the me now could make it a lot better myself just putting the time and attention to detail for her and without bringing another c**k in the situation. When I was young though No one could tell me I was doing anything wrong cause I was a dumba**. 😆

Posted
I think everyone is missing the point. The op states bad sex for the rest of your life or no sex at all. It's not bad sex with the chance of getting better, it's quite simply bad sex for the rest of your life. It's nice to see that most have tried to put a spin on it. But in the end it's a simple question of would you put up with bad sex for the rest of your life or would you just for get about sex all together
Posted

Tough one to answer! It’s s kind of a choice between a red hot poker up your a**e or chop your d**k off. 😄 As ***ful as it might be I’d rather go for the bad sex. It’s familiar at least & better than no sex at all, for the rest of your life? I mean c’mon wtf🤷🏻‍♂️😅

×
×
  • Create New...