Should male slaves/subs be hairless?

[CagedClitLvr]

I like hairless but I like pubic hair trimmed not shaved completely.

[24****]

A hairless slave male is absolutely ideal for a dominant female.  

[VV****]

It’s an interesting question…from My perspective it’s less about the presence or absence of hair on a submissive and more about whether they are groomed to their Dom/mes liking. The willingness to shave/not shave based on the desire of their Dominant can show that deeper level of devotion in My opinion.

[sw****]

I keep my genitals and undercarriage pretty well shorn., it presents a better situation for everyone., let's face it. Male genitalia is fucking ugly. Put the effort in. Everyone benefits.

[Th****]

2 hours ago, Guest Kenya1234 said:

A hairless slave male is absolutely ideal for a dominant female.  

State your personal preference, sure, but do not speak for all Dominant women. 

[Th****]

Personally I don't like the generalized expectation that seems to be prevalent that male submissive "should be" hairless or that feminization is a given. I actually take some pretty big issues with it but that's really for a whole post of it's own. 

I prefer some sort of general grooming and it really varies. Some men aren't really that hairy so it's not as big of a deal, if they're genetically extra hairy, I prefer not to end up with mouths full of hair so just something to mitigate that is appreciated and simple trimming is often sufficient. Same as beard management and haircuts, do the up keep, care for yourself. 

Now on a totally different track, my wicked sadist self *really* loves the idea of waxing a sub. Not necessarily for the results but for the sensations given. It's unlikely I'd go for arms or legs though at least to start with. 

[welshslaveboy]

Definitely a massive mix of opinions on this then. I agree that on a purely superficial level hairless tends to suit a more slimmer or toned body. Oh and the whole ‘should’ terminology, yeah I get that nothing should be the norm, but was more after an share of opinions. Definitely erring towards hairless at the moment. 

Can we agree on one thing though? Feet, both male and female should NEVER, EVER have any hair on them! 

[Si****]

Id be ok with whatever my Mistress wants she gets period.. End of story 🔥💯

[Jn****]

Well im,shaved bald haha but I like to dominate and be dominated so unsure if that's of any help to you

[welshslaveboy]

10 hours ago, JnrRigger said:

Well im,shaved bald haha but I like to dominate and be dominated so unsure if that's of any help to you

Hahaa, you cover all bases, I like it!

[Ro****]

Sub/does personal preference

[as****]

I can see how the act of staying shaven could hit a devotion to your whims thing. For me tho, I like natural hair levels. If I have a man under my control I like seeing the natural hair and burliness that is being offered up.

[fe****]

Yes baby they do

[welshslaveboy]

If a dom expected me to be clean shaven all over I’d totally respect that. I do find quite a turn on to be made to do that tbh. 

[na****]

Is this really a topic of conversation. Maintain your personal hygiene. Get a wax. It’s really that simple 🙄

[Th****]

On 8/3/2023 at 2:04 AM, welshslaveboy said:

Can we agree on one thing though? Feet, both male and female should NEVER, EVER have any hair on them! 

No?

Why does it matter how some stranger prefers to groom as long as they take care of themselves? 

[Th****]

9 minutes ago, naughtynat said:

Is this really a topic of conversation. Maintain your personal hygiene. Get a wax. It’s really that simple 🙄

Being hygienic doesn't mean hairless 

[ge****]

4 hours ago, ThaliaVirago said:

Being hygienic doesn't mean hairless 

Totally agree - being shaved or not has absolutely nothing to do with hygiene, in fact there are studies that suggest hair grows there to protect the body from bacteria and other infections. There is certainly no medical reason that advocates removal of pubic hair.
.
Hygiene actually comes down to the individual behind the hair or not, and their personal hygiene standards - anyone, hairless or not, who showers/bathes daily and pays attention to their own personal hygiene is being hygienic.
.
It's the same as the old "hairs between my teeth/stuck in my throat" argument - in 40 odd years of being sexually active I don't think I've ever had hair stuck between my teeth, or anything more than a momentary issue with loose hairs in my mouth, which are easily and discreetly removed.

[na****]

5 hours ago, ThaliaVirago said:

Being hygienic doesn't mean hairless 

Think you missed the point and contradicted your own earlier comment.

[na****]

57 minutes ago, gemini_man said:

Totally agree - being shaved or not has absolutely nothing to do with hygiene, in fact there are studies that suggest hair grows there to protect the body from bacteria and other infections. There is certainly no medical reason that advocates removal of pubic hair.
.
Hygiene actually comes down to the individual behind the hair or not, and their personal hygiene standards - anyone, hairless or not, who showers/bathes daily and pays attention to their own personal hygiene is being hygienic.
.
It's the same as the old "hairs between my teeth/stuck in my throat" argument - in 40 odd years of being sexually active I don't think I've ever had hair stuck between my teeth, or anything more than a momentary issue with loose hairs in my mouth, which are easily and discreetly removed.

Attempting to cite studies really doesn’t doesn’t make this an exciting worthy topic I’m afraid.

[ge****]

33 minutes ago, naughtynat said:

Attempting to cite studies really doesn’t doesn’t make this an exciting worthy topic I’m afraid.

Would post links to said studies if it were allowed however simply Google "pubic hair and hygiene" and you'll find plenty of articles, some written by respected medical people (as opposed to random strangers hypothesising and spouting myths on an internet site).
.
Exciting or not the facts are that pubic hair or not has no bearing on hygiene, the owner of the body however very much does.
.
If your preference is for hairless that's absolutely fine but please don't try and shame those by suggesting they're unhygienic for *their* preference - which is what you effectively did.

[na****]

1 hour ago, gemini_man said:

Would post links to said studies if it were allowed however simply Google "pubic hair and hygiene" and you'll find plenty of articles, some written by respected medical people (as opposed to random strangers hypothesising and spouting myths on an internet site).
.
Exciting or not the facts are that pubic hair or not has no bearing on hygiene, the owner of the body however very much does.
.
If your preference is for hairless that's absolutely fine but please don't try and shame those by suggesting they're unhygienic for *their* preference - which is what you effectively did.

I don’t need a lesson on how to research via Google. However. Thank you.

I have not shamed anyone so “please” do not insinuate I have. Also please do not attempt to guide me as to what I can and cannot do. Which includes allowing myself and others to contribute. You do not know me and you do not know anything about MY preferences.

Do not attempt to instruct me how to behave. I am not a follower. I am not an enabler. So freely let others speak as they wish. I merely made a comment. There was certainly no suggestion it was toward any one person. Frankly I’m over a pointless conversation about pubic hair. I have more productive things to do than compile endless posts. So we can leave it there.

I hope you have a fulfilling weekend.

[Th****]

3 hours ago, naughtynat said:

Think you missed the point and contradicted your own earlier comment.

What was the point then and how am I contradicting myself? 

[Th****]

On 8/4/2023 at 1:22 AM, femjess said:

Yes baby they do

No they don't, many? Yes but not everyone has the same preferences 

[Sh****]

Depends on who involved